I found this interesting article describing a Sociopath.

Antisocial Personality Disorder is also known as psychopathy or sociopathy. Individuals with this disorder have little regard for the feeling and welfare of others. As a clinical diagnosis it is usually limited to those over age 18. It can be diagnosed in younger people if the they commit isolated antisocial acts and do not show signs of another mental disorder.

Antisocial Personality Disorder is chronic, beginning in adolescence and continuing throughout adulthood. There are ten general symptoms:

not learning from experience
no sense of responsibility
inability to form meaningful relationships
inability to control impulses
lack of moral sense
chronically antisocial behavior
no change in behavior after punishment
emotional immaturity
lack of guilt

People with this disorder may exhibit criminal behavior. They perhaps do not work. If they do work, they are frequently absent or may quit suddenly. They do not consider other people’s wishes, welfare or rights. They can be manipulative and may lie to gain personal pleasure or profit. They may default on loans, fail to provide child support, or fail to care for their dependents adequately. High risk sexual behavior and substance abuse are common. Impulsiveness, failure to plan ahead, aggressiveness, irritability, irresponsibility, and a reckless disregard for their own safety and the safety of others are traits of the antisocial personality.

Socioeconomic status, gender, and genetic factors play a role. Males are more likely to be antisocial than females. Those from lower socioeconomic groups are more susceptible. A family history of the disorder puts one at higher risk.

There are many theories about the cause of Antisocial Personality Disorder including experiencing neglectful parenting as a child, low levels of certain neurotransmitters in the brain, and belief that antisocial behavior is justified because of difficult circumstances. Psychotherapy, group therapy, and family therapy are common treatments. The effects of medical treatment are inconclusive. Unfortunately, most people with Antisocial Personality Disorder reject treatment. Therefore, recovery rates are low.

Here is a very different, minority perspective from someone who believes himself to be a sociopath:
“Sociopath” is a misleading word: it implies a disorder, something wrong and unnatural with the person, and this couldn’t be further from the truth. We, the people you refer to as sociopaths, have nothing wrong with us.

We are necessary for the survival and sucess of the human species. Though we are found disporportionatly in prisons we are found with even greater frequency in your governments, your corporations, your military. Who else but someone devoid of concience could order thousands of soldiers to die, regardless of how noble the cause? Who can fire hundreds of workers to save a company from bankrupcy and then go to sleep that night? Who can so elegantly tell the lies that must be told, to protect the very people to whom the lies are told? It takes one of us to make those calls, the calls that the rest of humanity cannot make.

It is no coincidence that our lack of guilt comes with abnormally high intelligence and charisma; we are born to lead, all our traits support this conclusion. We are born knowing it, and the rest of you know it when you see us. Its why you elect us, follow us, and gives your lives by our command.

And yet a distressing number of us become the very thing you fear us all to be; criminals and abusers. This creates a cycle of ignorance, as all the “sociopaths” identified by the news are killers or wife-beaters, and so we identify this collection of gifts as evil, as pathological, and thus those of us in our proper roles feel the need to disguise ourselves for fear of being labeled evil. A simmilar cycle of ignorance has kept homosexuals oppressed for decades; homosexualty has been associated with childmolesters and perverts, drug use and desease, and it was called “evil” for this.

We are not evil, you simply do not recognise the good ones as the same phenomena. Google “Sociopath” and all you find is ways to recover from contact with a sociopath, information advising you to run from relationsships with sociopaths, and misinformation that will claim that “sociopaths cannot feel love” or that we “cannot think of others as human beings” or that we are “parasitic”.

It is very distressing to discover, for a child who has always known that he was different, that he is a monster… that he is doomed to live a loveless life and become a criminal, that he will never be able to hold a job or raise a family. Indeed, one must wonder how often one of us discoveres what he is and buys into the paranoid misinformation and simply does what he is expected to do.

Your question: “What is a sociopath?” is answered thusly: a sociopath is one of your potential leaders, labelled by the paranoid masses as something sick and evil, and is left no alternative but an evil path. “Sociopath” is a negative label which only serves to further alienate people who simply need to be allowed to embrace their gifts. Getting rid of this misleading term should be the first step towards fully understanding who we are and the role we play in this world.

Comment on last answer

The notion that all sociopaths are very clever is a myth. Many are failures who make others suffer for their inadequacies. Most sociopaths are profoundly chaotic types.

It’s a myth that sociopaths are born leaders. Instead of providing leadership, they treat others as their playthings, just as a bully or sadist does.

A true leader has emotional maturity and earns respect. Fear isn’t respect: the notion that the two are the same is pathetic. One cannot respect people who are incapable accept responsibility for their actions and constantly pretend to be victims when they are perpetrators.


5 responses to “What is a SOCIOPATH

  1. Travis wrote an email in February 07 explaining that it was easier to humour her than stop altogether, because she was emotionally blackmailing him, with tears, hysterics etc. Jodi wrote an email in Feb 07, saying that she was not T’s girlfriend, and there was no commitment between them. She wasn’t living in Mesa. So where does she get off complaining and getting angry with him about where she stands. She knows where she stands, she refuses to accept it. Is there any real evidence that they had a commitment of sorts between Feb 07 and June 07? She breaks up with him in June then moves to Mesa in July 07. Jodi’s journal entry August 07, indicates she was ruminating about T’s death and about suicide complaining about unreciprocated love…she wanted to duct tape down, cut like a light switch, lifeless, etc. That was 10 months before she killed him. This killing does not have to do with T’s personality, it has to do with J’s mental illness, probably a psychotic episode, judging by how she writes and presents herself. She does not meet criteria for sociopath, but seems to meet psychopath diagnosis, but it was never assessed, what a blunder.


  2. The sociopath diagnosis, is same as anti-social personality disorder, it would require that Jodi had a conduct disorder in her preteens or before 19. We don’t have enough historical info on Jodi to know if she had a conduct disorder in teen years. She seems to meet criteria for borderline personality, and possibly PTSD , and to meet criteria for psychopathy. I’m wondering why no one assessed her for psychopathy using the famous Hare checklist. Also wondering why forensic psychiatry were not recruited to assess her properly.


  3. Socio/psychopaths DO have “the capacity to determine the mental states of others”, I.e. “empathy.” This capacity is necessary to successfully deceive and manipulate ‘targets’. Further, due to the tendency to enjoy the taste of destruction – Schadenfreude – they must also have a certain level of ‘affective discernment – without this, sadism has no ‘savor’.


  4. In the study of criminology, it has been discovered that there is a part of the brain that does not show activity when another suffers. Ex., you and I are having a conversation and you get a phone call that tells you your mother is very ill. You are upset, but I don’t know your mother. Nonetheless, I have feelings for your pain. (BTW, this was an example used by Dr. Kristina Randle who writes on psychopathy and Jodi Arias) The area of my brain that lights up with feelings for your pain does not do so in many criminals. Very interesting.


  5. I love the sociopath’s justification. All of his/her paragraphs can be translated as either: 1) Have sympathy for me and feel sorry for me; 2) My faults are your fault because you have created me as you perceive me to be. I am not real. I am just the creation of your imagination.

    What total BS …A sociopath ***by definition*** is highly manipulative and lacks empathy. If you have empathy and aren’t abnormally manipulative you’re not a sociopath. So, to suggest that sociopaths have empathy is to completely contradict the entire definition. If a sociopath had empathy they wouldn’t be a sociopath. duh


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s